Jenna Cole Photography-Chicago, IL bio picture

Fresh. Original. You.

I'm Jenna, the woman behind the camera at Jenna Cole. My first and middle names are really Jenna Nichole but I like to keep things short and easy to remember so I gave myself a nickname for my middle name. Innovation and originality are two traits I'm always striving to embody, whether in my personal or professional life, and I want to work with clients who want the same thing from their photography experience. I don't just want to shoot your session or wedding, I want to work with you to design the best photo experience possible!

Dress up in your fanciest clothes and meet me in the grungiest location you can think of. Theme your shoot around a word or idea, like "bright colors", and bring props that make your photos pop. Silhouettes at sunset, your new puppy, a 50's theme... let's create something that describes you

You can read more about my personal life at That Wife, add me on Twitter, or find me on Facebook. Thank you for visiting and for commenting (I read them all and they make my day!). 

I'm currently located in Dallas, TX but will be relocating to Chicago in August 2010. 

Wedding Photography Equipment

A few months ago, this clip circled pretty quickly among photographers on Twitter. The couple featured learned from experience that owning a nice camera doesn’t guarantee beautiful photos.

I feel for the bride! It sounds like she attempted to do her research, attending a bridal show in hopes of picking the perfect photographer for her from among a pool that she assumed would only be made up of top-notch photographers. Unfortunately all it takes to call yourself a photographer is the purchase of a camera and 10 minutes setting up a free blog or website. (In all fairness I am one of these people as I have had no formal training in photography :) )

One way to avoid experiencing the same fate is to ask to see a full wedding that your photographer has delivered to clients. Looking through all of the photos from the day, from start to finish, will help you see if the artist you are considered can handle the many different lighting situations that can be encountered throughout the wedding day. It is my opinion that every photographer willing to shoot weddings should be willing and able to show you a full wedding from their past.

An interview with a potential bride made me realize that there is another vein of questions that an astute brides and grooms can ask when searching for the perfect photographer for their wedding day. This particular bride surprised me by asking, “Can you tell me a little bit more about the equipment you would be using to shoot my wedding?”

Wow, I wasn’t expecting that! I gladly spent some time talking to her about what I have.

My main body is a Canon 5D Mark II:

My backup body is a Canon 50D:

Hiring a photographer with backup equipment is important because accidents and malfunctions happen, and you want to be sure that the person capturing your wedding day can keep on shooting without a run to the nearest electronics store for an emergency purchase. It’s also important to have more than one lens (once I tripped and fell at a wedding, landing directly on one of my lenses and rendering it useless for the rest of the wedding day), and if your ceremony/reception will be in low-light areas you might want to ask what your photographer would do in the event that one of their flashes stopped working for the day.

These questions can be intimidating to ask because you are likely talking to someone who can talk for hours about megapixels, aperture, and ISO, things you might not know anything about. Here is one simple question that you can ask which should guide your photographer to send back uncomplicated replies.

Do you have backup equipment for your main camera body, lens, and flash? What would you do in the event of an accident or technical malfunction resulting in the loss of one of these?

You can also ask what kind of camera body they are using, but assuming that a more expensive camera body will give you even more beautiful photos than the next guy is a mistake. Anyone can purchase a $7000 camera body and have no idea how to harness its power. If you do ask about the camera body I would be wary of anyone charging several thousand dollars and using entry level cameras from either the Nikon or Canon lines. Camera bodies that cost more are more versatile, handle low light situations better, and generally a person using professional level camera body has invested similarly in the lenses and other accessories they are using as well.

I think if more brides were to ask about backup equipment and viewing full weddings there would be less stories of unmet expectations like the woman who appeared before Judge Joe Brown.

July 21, 2010 - 5:20 pm Ravyn - I saw that clip a few months ago ... Seems like Mr. Brown knows a bit about photography, haha. So sad though ... it happens all too often!

July 21, 2010 - 5:57 pm BB - Wow! That makes me so grateful for the photographer we worked with.

July 21, 2010 - 8:58 pm Jessica @ One Shiny Star - I saw that episode on TV - I didn't have to watch it here because I remember it! So ridiculous!

Dear Fellow Photographers…

My cutie of a son :)

Congrats! You have a blog. I love to subscribe to the blogs of my peers and be inspired by their work. (It’s also a great way for me to learn about interesting locations around the area I live!)

As someone who subscribes to a lot of blogs, I admit I have a few pet peeves that could be easily fixed if you would take a few moments to do so.

First, modify the title tag for your site to indicate where you are located. When you visit my blog it’s really easy to see where I am located, because it has Jenna Cole Photography-Dallas, TX running across the top. Christine of Big Pink Cookie just posted about this as well.

When I subscribe to your blog in my Google Reader, I file you away in the correct folder. Right now as I’m preparing to move to Chicago I’m building up my Photographers-Illinois folder, attempting to learn who my peers will be when I relocate. Unfortunately many of them haven’t named their feed correctly, and so they show up in my reader named “Blog” or the title starts with something like “Wedding Photography” and I have to highlight over the name to see who it is. Make sure that your name shows up when I subscribe to your feed, and start the title with your name, not your location or what you do, otherwise you get lost in a sea of other “Chicago Wedding Photography” titles.

Summarized posts. This, in my opinion, only discourages people from subscribing to and reading your blog. I don’t read blogs that do this, because clicking over every time is so frustrating and time consuming. If you want to know how many people are reading, burn your feed using Feedburner and log in to check your “reach” each day. You’ll reach more people if you stop summarizing your content, I guarantee it.

The worst offense? Some of you don’t even HAVE a feed. Blogs are meant to be something people can subscribe to, to allow them to keep up with your ever-changing content. I don’t have time to check your page each day for new content, I want Google Reader to take care of that for me. If you don’t have a feed, I, and many other readers like myself, will never take the time to check out the beautiful work you are producing. And that would be a shame indeed.

The secret to knowing if it’s easy to subscribe to your blog? Sign up for Google Reader and subscribe to yourself. You’ll see what it’s going to be like for others who would like to do so.

The best part about these tips? Your clients and potential clients will like these changes as well!

Sincerely,

Jenna Cole

July 16, 2010 - 2:31 pm Lauren - Ditto, ditto, and ditto! Well said! :) Will be retweeting this for sure!

July 16, 2010 - 2:35 pm Kimmie - I'm not a photographer, but even regular blogs should do these things! I can't stand summarized posts, or even posts that don't have ANYTHING at all except the title and you have to click over to read it. I only subscribe to two of those kinds of feeds (out of hundreds), and it's only because I adore their blogs too much to unsubscribe. And I hate when I'm viewing photography websites and I can't figure out where the heck the person is located (if I wanted to book them for a session). I have to poke around and can't find it until I view their profile. That's happened a few times already!

July 16, 2010 - 2:44 pm DrayaAnn - Speaking of you moving up here, I have started a running list in my head of cool places to tell you about that you could shoot at. I'm so excited you'll be up here soon!!

July 16, 2010 - 4:14 pm Corey Ann - I hate hate hate hate hate summarized posts or the ones that say "go to the blog!" - just unsubscribed to a TON of those actually. Can I add for people to actually VIEW their blog on a reader to see what it looks like? I hate when pics are all wonky and weird. Pet peeve I guess.

July 16, 2010 - 4:58 pm Jenna - Yes! I just subscribed to a blog where the pictures are HUGE in reader. You can't see the whole thing unless you scroll from side to side. No way I'm doing that.

July 16, 2010 - 11:20 pm Mandie - Hey Jenna! I learned that you can go into "Manage Subscriptions" in the Google Reader (bottom left side in tiny letters) and rename the title of the subscriptions yourself. Comes in handy!

July 19, 2010 - 6:01 pm Kat Speyer - I also hate summarized posts. Blegh. But I do have to say that there is a reason NOT to start your blog title with your name or your business name. The title, of course, is one of your most valuable SEO assets, which is why you must have your location in it, or at least some keywords describing what it is that you do. In most circles, it is agreed upon that search engines (namely, Google) values keywords that are placed first more than those that follow. So, naturally, if you are banking on rating for you location or trying to capitalize on those keywords, you might want to put them first. However, if you don't have your name in there at all, that's no good either. :(

Maternity: Typhanie

Typhanie and I go to church together, and I visit her every month through the Visiting Teaching program. She was recently put on bed rest (not confined to a bed luckily, just told to take it easy) and so I brought a meal over to her house to help ease the burden of caring for her husband and two small children. Along with the pasta I packed my camera and we grabbed a few maternity style shots to document her pregnancy.

Typhanie showed me a maternity photo she liked and asked if we could duplicate it. It was fun to try to give it my own little spin!

Definitely my favorite from our quick 10 minute session. I don’t usually shoot stuff indoors but Typhanie has a beautiful house with lots of light so we were able to use the hall in her entryway for these.

We stepped outside for a  minute and did a few outside as well.

Looking forward to meeting him Typhanie!

While I took her picture my little one had a grand old time in the Bumbo they have (I’ve been thinking about getting one), while her two crazy sons danced around and sang songs for him. It was madness and he loved it!

Personal: Elder Andersen

My “little” cousin (not so little anymore!) left on his 2-year LDS service mission to Brazil last month. Hard to believe that I actually have memories of holding him in my arms as a 6 year old. I also have a shiny scar on the top of my left foot from where he ran over me with a mini John Deere tractor. Despite all the stitches I wound up with from that experience I love him anyway!

What A Difference A Year Makes

Things have been a little slow for me lately* and so I’ve been accepting sessions I don’t normally do on a limited basis, like the session I recently did with Tracy’s son. She was inspired by this session I did last summer and after I processed her images and then went back to see the results from last year I was shocked. Look at the difference a year makes!

Here is what I posted on my blog last year.

And here is one of the shots I’ll be giving to Tracy. Huge difference right? Since last summer I’ve upgraded my equipment (I had a camera body that was making everything very red which was very frustrating to work with), and my shooting and processing styles have changed a bit as well. Hopefully you will all agree they’ve changed for the better!

This shoot was in Deep Ellum and I love that I can find new graffiti and murals no matter how often I visit.

We’ll end with my favorite shot from the day. Isn’t he a sweetheart?
*Is it okay to admit that? No one else seems to do so, but with an economic downturn like the one we’re experiencing here in the US, I can’t be the only one who’s noticing that people are cutting back on the amount of money they are budgeting toward photography!

July 6, 2010 - 3:44 pm Kelli Nicole - Those are so cute! I love the first shot of him (2nd pic in the post). And yes, it does look better!

July 6, 2010 - 4:02 pm Chelsea McGowan - Yes, it's okay to admit that, but it's not universal. We're busier than we've ever been, but I think it's because we upped our package prices this year. I hope this doesn't sound wrong... I've worded it carefully... basically, I think that to a bride with a $8K event budget, $2,000+ does seem like a huge amount for photography. But to a bride with a $25K budget, what we charge is not that big of a deal. Both weddings can be gorgeous in their own way, but the latter is definitely where a photographer is going to earn their living. It can be hard to break into that market, but once you do, your life will be a lot easier. Love the progress in your work, btw! I need to do one of these posts myself!

July 6, 2010 - 5:41 pm Kaci - Is that the same wall? That's amazing if it is. Just curious what your old equipment was, compared to your new stuff. Love your pics! He is definitely a cutie!

July 6, 2010 - 6:08 pm Jenna - Yep! Same location. I went from a Canon 50D to a Canon 5Dmarkii. I was having major trouble with all of my images turning out "red" and my husband did some research and told me he thinks it is because of the way Canon sensors are made. They are all made individually, which means each one captures things slightly differently and so when programs like Adobe Photoshop try to read the RAW data they have to make their best guess regarding what all of the data should be interpreted as. My data was unfortunately rather off. The problem was solved when I switched to shooting JPG, but I like shooting RAW so I decided to upgrade (in part because I wanted to make videos of my son as well). I also bought a 50mm 1.2, where I was using a 50mm 1.4 before. I actually don't think getting the more expensive lens would have made that much of a difference though. In this instance I think the new body and experience were what really did it. And I've become a lot better at metering in camera and not blowing out the highlights (well not blowing them out too much, I like to push the envelope in that areas :) )

July 12, 2010 - 7:49 am Jessica - This little boy melts my heart! So adorable! Beautiful and rich shots too Jenna, you always amaze me